Information on Result #464340

There is no (130, 132, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 133, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (130, 134, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (130, 135, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (130, 136, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (130, 137, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (130, 138, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (130, 139, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (130, 140, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (130, 141, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (130, 142, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (130, 143, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (130, 144, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (130, 145, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (130, 146, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (130, 147, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (130, 148, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (130, 149, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (130, 150, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (130, 151, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (130, 152, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (130, 153, large)-net in base 3 [i]