Information on Result #464343

There is no (133, 135, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 136, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (133, 137, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (133, 138, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (133, 139, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (133, 140, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (133, 141, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (133, 142, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (133, 143, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (133, 144, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (133, 145, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (133, 146, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (133, 147, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (133, 148, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (133, 149, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (133, 150, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (133, 151, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (133, 152, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (133, 153, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (133, 154, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (133, 155, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (133, 156, large)-net in base 3 [i]