Information on Result #464369

There is no (159, 161, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (159, 162, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (159, 163, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (159, 164, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (159, 165, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (159, 166, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (159, 167, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (159, 168, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (159, 169, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (159, 170, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (159, 171, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (159, 172, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (159, 173, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (159, 174, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (159, 175, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (159, 176, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (159, 177, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (159, 178, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (159, 179, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (159, 180, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (159, 181, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (159, 182, large)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (159, 183, large)-net in base 3 [i]
23No (159, 184, large)-net in base 3 [i]
24No (159, 185, large)-net in base 3 [i]
25No (159, 186, large)-net in base 3 [i]