Information on Result #464370

There is no (160, 162, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 163, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (160, 164, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (160, 165, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (160, 166, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (160, 167, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (160, 168, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (160, 169, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (160, 170, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (160, 171, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (160, 172, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (160, 173, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (160, 174, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (160, 175, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (160, 176, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (160, 177, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (160, 178, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (160, 179, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (160, 180, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (160, 181, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (160, 182, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (160, 183, large)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (160, 184, large)-net in base 3 [i]
23No (160, 185, large)-net in base 3 [i]
24No (160, 186, large)-net in base 3 [i]
25No (160, 187, large)-net in base 3 [i]