Information on Result #464371

There is no (161, 163, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 164, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (161, 165, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (161, 166, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (161, 167, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (161, 168, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (161, 169, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (161, 170, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (161, 171, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (161, 172, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (161, 173, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (161, 174, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (161, 175, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (161, 176, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (161, 177, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (161, 178, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (161, 179, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (161, 180, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (161, 181, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (161, 182, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (161, 183, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (161, 184, large)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (161, 185, large)-net in base 3 [i]
23No (161, 186, large)-net in base 3 [i]
24No (161, 187, large)-net in base 3 [i]
25No (161, 188, large)-net in base 3 [i]