Information on Result #464381

There is no (171, 173, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 174, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (171, 175, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (171, 176, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (171, 177, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (171, 178, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (171, 179, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (171, 180, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (171, 181, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (171, 182, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (171, 183, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (171, 184, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (171, 185, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (171, 186, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (171, 187, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (171, 188, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (171, 189, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (171, 190, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (171, 191, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (171, 192, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (171, 193, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (171, 194, large)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (171, 195, large)-net in base 3 [i]
23No (171, 196, large)-net in base 3 [i]
24No (171, 197, large)-net in base 3 [i]
25No (171, 198, large)-net in base 3 [i]
26No (171, 199, large)-net in base 3 [i]
27No (171, 200, large)-net in base 3 [i]