Information on Result #464437

There is no (227, 229, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (227, 230, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (227, 231, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (227, 232, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (227, 233, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (227, 234, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (227, 235, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (227, 236, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (227, 237, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (227, 238, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (227, 239, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (227, 240, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (227, 241, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (227, 242, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (227, 243, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (227, 244, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (227, 245, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (227, 246, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (227, 247, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (227, 248, large)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (227, 249, large)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (227, 250, large)-net in base 3 [i]