Information on Result #464439

There is no (229, 231, large)-net in base 3, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (229, 232, large)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (229, 233, large)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (229, 234, large)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (229, 235, large)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (229, 236, large)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (229, 237, large)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (229, 238, large)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (229, 239, large)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (229, 240, large)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (229, 241, large)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (229, 242, large)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (229, 243, large)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (229, 244, large)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (229, 245, large)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (229, 246, large)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (229, 247, large)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (229, 248, large)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (229, 249, large)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (229, 250, large)-net in base 3 [i]