Information on Result #464571

There is no (112, 114, large)-net in base 4, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (112, 115, large)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction
2No (112, 116, large)-net in base 4 [i]
3No (112, 117, large)-net in base 4 [i]
4No (112, 118, large)-net in base 4 [i]
5No (112, 119, large)-net in base 4 [i]
6No (112, 120, large)-net in base 4 [i]
7No (112, 121, large)-net in base 4 [i]
8No (112, 122, large)-net in base 4 [i]
9No (112, 123, large)-net in base 4 [i]
10No (112, 124, large)-net in base 4 [i]
11No (112, 125, large)-net in base 4 [i]
12No (112, 126, large)-net in base 4 [i]
13No (112, 127, large)-net in base 4 [i]
14No (112, 128, large)-net in base 4 [i]
15No (112, 129, large)-net in base 4 [i]
16No (112, 130, large)-net in base 4 [i]
17No (112, 131, large)-net in base 4 [i]
18No (112, 132, large)-net in base 4 [i]
19No (112, 133, large)-net in base 4 [i]
20No (112, 134, large)-net in base 4 [i]
21No (112, 135, large)-net in base 4 [i]
22No (112, 136, large)-net in base 4 [i]
23No (112, 137, large)-net in base 4 [i]