Information on Result #464784
There is no (66, 68, large)-net in base 5, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (66, 69, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (66, 70, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
3 | No (66, 71, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
4 | No (66, 72, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
5 | No (66, 73, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
6 | No (66, 74, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
7 | No (66, 75, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
8 | No (66, 76, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
9 | No (66, 77, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
10 | No (66, 78, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
11 | No (66, 79, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
12 | No (66, 80, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
13 | No (66, 81, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
14 | No (66, 82, large)-net in base 5 | [i] | ||
15 | No (66, 83, large)-net in base 5 | [i] |