Information on Result #464800

There is no (82, 84, large)-net in base 5, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 85, large)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction
2No (82, 86, large)-net in base 5 [i]
3No (82, 87, large)-net in base 5 [i]
4No (82, 88, large)-net in base 5 [i]
5No (82, 89, large)-net in base 5 [i]
6No (82, 90, large)-net in base 5 [i]
7No (82, 91, large)-net in base 5 [i]
8No (82, 92, large)-net in base 5 [i]
9No (82, 93, large)-net in base 5 [i]
10No (82, 94, large)-net in base 5 [i]
11No (82, 95, large)-net in base 5 [i]
12No (82, 96, large)-net in base 5 [i]
13No (82, 97, large)-net in base 5 [i]
14No (82, 98, large)-net in base 5 [i]
15No (82, 99, large)-net in base 5 [i]
16No (82, 100, large)-net in base 5 [i]
17No (82, 101, large)-net in base 5 [i]
18No (82, 102, large)-net in base 5 [i]
19No (82, 103, large)-net in base 5 [i]