Information on Result #464811

There is no (93, 95, large)-net in base 5, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 96, large)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction
2No (93, 97, large)-net in base 5 [i]
3No (93, 98, large)-net in base 5 [i]
4No (93, 99, large)-net in base 5 [i]
5No (93, 100, large)-net in base 5 [i]
6No (93, 101, large)-net in base 5 [i]
7No (93, 102, large)-net in base 5 [i]
8No (93, 103, large)-net in base 5 [i]
9No (93, 104, large)-net in base 5 [i]
10No (93, 105, large)-net in base 5 [i]
11No (93, 106, large)-net in base 5 [i]
12No (93, 107, large)-net in base 5 [i]
13No (93, 108, large)-net in base 5 [i]
14No (93, 109, large)-net in base 5 [i]
15No (93, 110, large)-net in base 5 [i]
16No (93, 111, large)-net in base 5 [i]
17No (93, 112, large)-net in base 5 [i]
18No (93, 113, large)-net in base 5 [i]
19No (93, 114, large)-net in base 5 [i]
20No (93, 115, large)-net in base 5 [i]
21No (93, 116, large)-net in base 5 [i]
22No (93, 117, large)-net in base 5 [i]
23No (93, 118, large)-net in base 5 [i]