Information on Result #464850

There is no (132, 134, large)-net in base 5, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 135, large)-net in base 5 [i]m-Reduction
2No (132, 136, large)-net in base 5 [i]
3No (132, 137, large)-net in base 5 [i]
4No (132, 138, large)-net in base 5 [i]
5No (132, 139, large)-net in base 5 [i]
6No (132, 140, large)-net in base 5 [i]
7No (132, 141, large)-net in base 5 [i]
8No (132, 142, large)-net in base 5 [i]
9No (132, 143, large)-net in base 5 [i]
10No (132, 144, large)-net in base 5 [i]
11No (132, 145, large)-net in base 5 [i]
12No (132, 146, large)-net in base 5 [i]
13No (132, 147, large)-net in base 5 [i]
14No (132, 148, large)-net in base 5 [i]
15No (132, 149, large)-net in base 5 [i]
16No (132, 150, large)-net in base 5 [i]