Information on Result #465037

There is no (61, 63, large)-net in base 8, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 64, large)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction
2No (61, 65, large)-net in base 8 [i]
3No (61, 66, large)-net in base 8 [i]
4No (61, 67, large)-net in base 8 [i]
5No (61, 68, large)-net in base 8 [i]
6No (61, 69, large)-net in base 8 [i]
7No (61, 70, large)-net in base 8 [i]
8No (61, 71, large)-net in base 8 [i]
9No (61, 72, large)-net in base 8 [i]
10No (61, 73, large)-net in base 8 [i]
11No (61, 74, large)-net in base 8 [i]
12No (61, 75, large)-net in base 8 [i]
13No (61, 76, large)-net in base 8 [i]
14No (61, 77, large)-net in base 8 [i]
15No (61, 78, large)-net in base 8 [i]
16No (61, 79, large)-net in base 8 [i]
17No (61, 80, large)-net in base 8 [i]
18No (61, 81, large)-net in base 8 [i]
19No (61, 82, large)-net in base 8 [i]