Information on Result #465178
There is no (30, 32, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (30, 33, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (30, 34, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
3 | No (30, 35, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
4 | No (30, 36, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
5 | No (30, 37, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
6 | No (30, 38, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
7 | No (30, 39, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
8 | No (30, 40, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
9 | No (30, 41, large)-net in base 9 | [i] |