Information on Result #465190
There is no (42, 44, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (42, 45, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (42, 46, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (42, 47, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (42, 48, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (42, 49, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (42, 50, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (42, 51, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (42, 52, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (42, 53, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (42, 54, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (42, 55, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (42, 56, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (42, 57, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||