Information on Result #465193
There is no (45, 47, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (45, 48, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (45, 49, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
3 | No (45, 50, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
4 | No (45, 51, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
5 | No (45, 52, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
6 | No (45, 53, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
7 | No (45, 54, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
8 | No (45, 55, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
9 | No (45, 56, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
10 | No (45, 57, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
11 | No (45, 58, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
12 | No (45, 59, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
13 | No (45, 60, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
14 | No (45, 61, large)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
15 | No (45, 62, large)-net in base 9 | [i] |