Information on Result #465201

There is no (53, 55, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 56, large)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (53, 57, large)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (53, 58, large)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (53, 59, large)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (53, 60, large)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (53, 61, large)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (53, 62, large)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (53, 63, large)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (53, 64, large)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (53, 65, large)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (53, 66, large)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (53, 67, large)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (53, 68, large)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (53, 69, large)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (53, 70, large)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (53, 71, large)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (53, 72, large)-net in base 9 [i]