Information on Result #465205

There is no (57, 59, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (57, 60, large)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (57, 61, large)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (57, 62, large)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (57, 63, large)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (57, 64, large)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (57, 65, large)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (57, 66, large)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (57, 67, large)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (57, 68, large)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (57, 69, large)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (57, 70, large)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (57, 71, large)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (57, 72, large)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (57, 73, large)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (57, 74, large)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (57, 75, large)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (57, 76, large)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (57, 77, large)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (57, 78, large)-net in base 9 [i]