Information on Result #465214

There is no (66, 68, large)-net in base 9, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 69, large)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (66, 70, large)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (66, 71, large)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (66, 72, large)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (66, 73, large)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (66, 74, large)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (66, 75, large)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (66, 76, large)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (66, 77, large)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (66, 78, large)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (66, 79, large)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (66, 80, large)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (66, 81, large)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (66, 82, large)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (66, 83, large)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (66, 84, large)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (66, 85, large)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (66, 86, large)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (66, 87, large)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (66, 88, large)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (66, 89, large)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (66, 90, large)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (66, 91, large)-net in base 9 [i]