Information on Result #465402

There is no (105, 107, large)-net in base 16, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (105, 108, large)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction
2No (105, 109, large)-net in base 16 [i]
3No (105, 110, large)-net in base 16 [i]
4No (105, 111, large)-net in base 16 [i]
5No (105, 112, large)-net in base 16 [i]
6No (105, 113, large)-net in base 16 [i]
7No (105, 114, large)-net in base 16 [i]
8No (105, 115, large)-net in base 16 [i]
9No (105, 116, large)-net in base 16 [i]
10No (105, 117, large)-net in base 16 [i]
11No (105, 118, large)-net in base 16 [i]
12No (105, 119, large)-net in base 16 [i]
13No (105, 120, large)-net in base 16 [i]
14No (105, 121, large)-net in base 16 [i]
15No (105, 122, large)-net in base 16 [i]
16No (105, 123, large)-net in base 16 [i]
17No (105, 124, large)-net in base 16 [i]
18No (105, 125, large)-net in base 16 [i]
19No (105, 126, large)-net in base 16 [i]
20No (105, 127, large)-net in base 16 [i]
21No (105, 128, large)-net in base 16 [i]
22No (105, 129, large)-net in base 16 [i]
23No (105, 130, large)-net in base 16 [i]