Information on Result #465410
There is no (113, 115, large)-net in base 16, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (113, 116, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (113, 117, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
3 | No (113, 118, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
4 | No (113, 119, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
5 | No (113, 120, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
6 | No (113, 121, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
7 | No (113, 122, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
8 | No (113, 123, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
9 | No (113, 124, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
10 | No (113, 125, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
11 | No (113, 126, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
12 | No (113, 127, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
13 | No (113, 128, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
14 | No (113, 129, large)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
15 | No (113, 130, large)-net in base 16 | [i] |