Information on Result #465471

There is no (45, 47, large)-net in base 25, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 48, large)-net in base 25 [i]m-Reduction
2No (45, 49, large)-net in base 25 [i]
3No (45, 50, large)-net in base 25 [i]
4No (45, 51, large)-net in base 25 [i]
5No (45, 52, large)-net in base 25 [i]
6No (45, 53, large)-net in base 25 [i]
7No (45, 54, large)-net in base 25 [i]
8No (45, 55, large)-net in base 25 [i]
9No (45, 56, large)-net in base 25 [i]
10No (45, 57, large)-net in base 25 [i]
11No (45, 58, large)-net in base 25 [i]
12No (45, 59, large)-net in base 25 [i]
13No (45, 60, large)-net in base 25 [i]
14No (45, 61, large)-net in base 25 [i]
15No (45, 62, large)-net in base 25 [i]
16No (45, 63, large)-net in base 25 [i]
17No (45, 64, large)-net in base 25 [i]
18No (45, 65, large)-net in base 25 [i]
19No (45, 66, large)-net in base 25 [i]
20No (45, 67, large)-net in base 25 [i]
21No (45, 68, large)-net in base 25 [i]
22No (45, 69, large)-net in base 25 [i]
23No (45, 70, large)-net in base 25 [i]
24No (45, 71, large)-net in base 25 [i]
25No (45, 72, large)-net in base 25 [i]