Information on Result #465512

There is no (86, 88, large)-net in base 25, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 89, large)-net in base 25 [i]m-Reduction
2No (86, 90, large)-net in base 25 [i]
3No (86, 91, large)-net in base 25 [i]
4No (86, 92, large)-net in base 25 [i]
5No (86, 93, large)-net in base 25 [i]
6No (86, 94, large)-net in base 25 [i]
7No (86, 95, large)-net in base 25 [i]
8No (86, 96, large)-net in base 25 [i]
9No (86, 97, large)-net in base 25 [i]
10No (86, 98, large)-net in base 25 [i]
11No (86, 99, large)-net in base 25 [i]
12No (86, 100, large)-net in base 25 [i]
13No (86, 101, large)-net in base 25 [i]
14No (86, 102, large)-net in base 25 [i]
15No (86, 103, large)-net in base 25 [i]
16No (86, 104, large)-net in base 25 [i]
17No (86, 105, large)-net in base 25 [i]
18No (86, 106, large)-net in base 25 [i]
19No (86, 107, large)-net in base 25 [i]
20No (86, 108, large)-net in base 25 [i]
21No (86, 109, large)-net in base 25 [i]
22No (86, 110, large)-net in base 25 [i]