Information on Result #465570

There is no (35, 37, large)-net in base 27, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (35, 38, large)-net in base 27 [i]m-Reduction
2No (35, 39, large)-net in base 27 [i]
3No (35, 40, large)-net in base 27 [i]
4No (35, 41, large)-net in base 27 [i]
5No (35, 42, large)-net in base 27 [i]
6No (35, 43, large)-net in base 27 [i]
7No (35, 44, large)-net in base 27 [i]
8No (35, 45, large)-net in base 27 [i]
9No (35, 46, large)-net in base 27 [i]
10No (35, 47, large)-net in base 27 [i]
11No (35, 48, large)-net in base 27 [i]
12No (35, 49, large)-net in base 27 [i]
13No (35, 50, large)-net in base 27 [i]
14No (35, 51, large)-net in base 27 [i]
15No (35, 52, large)-net in base 27 [i]
16No (35, 53, large)-net in base 27 [i]
17No (35, 54, large)-net in base 27 [i]
18No (35, 55, large)-net in base 27 [i]
19No (35, 56, large)-net in base 27 [i]