Information on Result #465676

There is no (32, 34, large)-net in base 32, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 35, large)-net in base 32 [i]m-Reduction
2No (32, 36, large)-net in base 32 [i]
3No (32, 37, large)-net in base 32 [i]
4No (32, 38, large)-net in base 32 [i]
5No (32, 39, large)-net in base 32 [i]
6No (32, 40, large)-net in base 32 [i]
7No (32, 41, large)-net in base 32 [i]
8No (32, 42, large)-net in base 32 [i]
9No (32, 43, large)-net in base 32 [i]
10No (32, 44, large)-net in base 32 [i]
11No (32, 45, large)-net in base 32 [i]
12No (32, 46, large)-net in base 32 [i]
13No (32, 47, large)-net in base 32 [i]
14No (32, 48, large)-net in base 32 [i]
15No (32, 49, large)-net in base 32 [i]
16No (32, 50, large)-net in base 32 [i]
17No (32, 51, large)-net in base 32 [i]
18No (32, 52, large)-net in base 32 [i]
19No (32, 53, large)-net in base 32 [i]