Information on Result #465684

There is no (40, 42, large)-net in base 32, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (40, 43, large)-net in base 32 [i]m-Reduction
2No (40, 44, large)-net in base 32 [i]
3No (40, 45, large)-net in base 32 [i]
4No (40, 46, large)-net in base 32 [i]
5No (40, 47, large)-net in base 32 [i]
6No (40, 48, large)-net in base 32 [i]
7No (40, 49, large)-net in base 32 [i]
8No (40, 50, large)-net in base 32 [i]
9No (40, 51, large)-net in base 32 [i]
10No (40, 52, large)-net in base 32 [i]
11No (40, 53, large)-net in base 32 [i]
12No (40, 54, large)-net in base 32 [i]
13No (40, 55, large)-net in base 32 [i]
14No (40, 56, large)-net in base 32 [i]
15No (40, 57, large)-net in base 32 [i]
16No (40, 58, large)-net in base 32 [i]
17No (40, 59, large)-net in base 32 [i]
18No (40, 60, large)-net in base 32 [i]
19No (40, 61, large)-net in base 32 [i]
20No (40, 62, large)-net in base 32 [i]
21No (40, 63, large)-net in base 32 [i]
22No (40, 64, large)-net in base 32 [i]
23No (40, 65, large)-net in base 32 [i]