Information on Result #465732

There is no (88, 90, large)-net in base 32, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (88, 91, large)-net in base 32 [i]m-Reduction
2No (88, 92, large)-net in base 32 [i]
3No (88, 93, large)-net in base 32 [i]
4No (88, 94, large)-net in base 32 [i]
5No (88, 95, large)-net in base 32 [i]
6No (88, 96, large)-net in base 32 [i]
7No (88, 97, large)-net in base 32 [i]
8No (88, 98, large)-net in base 32 [i]
9No (88, 99, large)-net in base 32 [i]
10No (88, 100, large)-net in base 32 [i]
11No (88, 101, large)-net in base 32 [i]
12No (88, 102, large)-net in base 32 [i]
13No (88, 103, large)-net in base 32 [i]
14No (88, 104, large)-net in base 32 [i]
15No (88, 105, large)-net in base 32 [i]
16No (88, 106, large)-net in base 32 [i]
17No (88, 107, large)-net in base 32 [i]
18No (88, 108, large)-net in base 32 [i]
19No (88, 109, large)-net in base 32 [i]
20No (88, 110, large)-net in base 32 [i]