Information on Result #465871

There is no (64, 66, large)-net in base 64, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 67, large)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction
2No (64, 68, large)-net in base 64 [i]
3No (64, 69, large)-net in base 64 [i]
4No (64, 70, large)-net in base 64 [i]
5No (64, 71, large)-net in base 64 [i]
6No (64, 72, large)-net in base 64 [i]
7No (64, 73, large)-net in base 64 [i]
8No (64, 74, large)-net in base 64 [i]
9No (64, 75, large)-net in base 64 [i]
10No (64, 76, large)-net in base 64 [i]
11No (64, 77, large)-net in base 64 [i]
12No (64, 78, large)-net in base 64 [i]
13No (64, 79, large)-net in base 64 [i]
14No (64, 80, large)-net in base 64 [i]
15No (64, 81, large)-net in base 64 [i]
16No (64, 82, large)-net in base 64 [i]
17No (64, 83, large)-net in base 64 [i]
18No (64, 84, large)-net in base 64 [i]
19No (64, 85, large)-net in base 64 [i]
20No (64, 86, large)-net in base 64 [i]
21No (64, 87, large)-net in base 64 [i]
22No (64, 88, large)-net in base 64 [i]
23No (64, 89, large)-net in base 64 [i]
24No (64, 90, large)-net in base 64 [i]
25No (64, 91, large)-net in base 64 [i]