Information on Result #465960

There is no (63, 65, large)-net in base 81, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 66, large)-net in base 81 [i]m-Reduction
2No (63, 67, large)-net in base 81 [i]
3No (63, 68, large)-net in base 81 [i]
4No (63, 69, large)-net in base 81 [i]
5No (63, 70, large)-net in base 81 [i]
6No (63, 71, large)-net in base 81 [i]
7No (63, 72, large)-net in base 81 [i]
8No (63, 73, large)-net in base 81 [i]
9No (63, 74, large)-net in base 81 [i]
10No (63, 75, large)-net in base 81 [i]
11No (63, 76, large)-net in base 81 [i]
12No (63, 77, large)-net in base 81 [i]
13No (63, 78, large)-net in base 81 [i]
14No (63, 79, large)-net in base 81 [i]
15No (63, 80, large)-net in base 81 [i]
16No (63, 81, large)-net in base 81 [i]
17No (63, 82, large)-net in base 81 [i]