Information on Result #465995
There is no (17, 19, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (17, 20, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (17, 21, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (17, 22, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (17, 23, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (17, 24, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (17, 25, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (17, 26, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (17, 27, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (17, 28, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (17, 29, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (17, 30, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (17, 31, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (17, 32, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (17, 33, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (17, 34, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||