Information on Result #465996
There is no (18, 20, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (18, 21, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (18, 22, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
3 | No (18, 23, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
4 | No (18, 24, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
5 | No (18, 25, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
6 | No (18, 26, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
7 | No (18, 27, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
8 | No (18, 28, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
9 | No (18, 29, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
10 | No (18, 30, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
11 | No (18, 31, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
12 | No (18, 32, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
13 | No (18, 33, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
14 | No (18, 34, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
15 | No (18, 35, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
16 | No (18, 36, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
17 | No (18, 37, large)-net in base 128 | [i] |