Information on Result #466000

There is no (22, 24, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (22, 25, large)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (22, 26, large)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (22, 27, large)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (22, 28, large)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (22, 29, large)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (22, 30, large)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (22, 31, large)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (22, 32, large)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (22, 33, large)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (22, 34, large)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (22, 35, large)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (22, 36, large)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (22, 37, large)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (22, 38, large)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (22, 39, large)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (22, 40, large)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (22, 41, large)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (22, 42, large)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (22, 43, large)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (22, 44, large)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (22, 45, large)-net in base 128 [i]