Information on Result #466003

There is no (25, 27, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (25, 28, large)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (25, 29, large)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (25, 30, large)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (25, 31, large)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (25, 32, large)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (25, 33, large)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (25, 34, large)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (25, 35, large)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (25, 36, large)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (25, 37, large)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (25, 38, large)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (25, 39, large)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (25, 40, large)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (25, 41, large)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (25, 42, large)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (25, 43, large)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (25, 44, large)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (25, 45, large)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (25, 46, large)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (25, 47, large)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (25, 48, large)-net in base 128 [i]
22No (25, 49, large)-net in base 128 [i]
23No (25, 50, large)-net in base 128 [i]