Information on Result #466004

There is no (26, 28, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (26, 29, large)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (26, 30, large)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (26, 31, large)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (26, 32, large)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (26, 33, large)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (26, 34, large)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (26, 35, large)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (26, 36, large)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (26, 37, large)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (26, 38, large)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (26, 39, large)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (26, 40, large)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (26, 41, large)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (26, 42, large)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (26, 43, large)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (26, 44, large)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (26, 45, large)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (26, 46, large)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (26, 47, large)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (26, 48, large)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (26, 49, large)-net in base 128 [i]
22No (26, 50, large)-net in base 128 [i]
23No (26, 51, large)-net in base 128 [i]
24No (26, 52, large)-net in base 128 [i]
25No (26, 53, large)-net in base 128 [i]