Information on Result #466005

There is no (27, 29, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (27, 30, large)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (27, 31, large)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (27, 32, large)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (27, 33, large)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (27, 34, large)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (27, 35, large)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (27, 36, large)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (27, 37, large)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (27, 38, large)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (27, 39, large)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (27, 40, large)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (27, 41, large)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (27, 42, large)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (27, 43, large)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (27, 44, large)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (27, 45, large)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (27, 46, large)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (27, 47, large)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (27, 48, large)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (27, 49, large)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (27, 50, large)-net in base 128 [i]
22No (27, 51, large)-net in base 128 [i]
23No (27, 52, large)-net in base 128 [i]
24No (27, 53, large)-net in base 128 [i]
25No (27, 54, large)-net in base 128 [i]
26No (27, 55, large)-net in base 128 [i]
27No (27, 56, large)-net in base 128 [i]