Information on Result #466028

There is no (50, 52, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (50, 53, large)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (50, 54, large)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (50, 55, large)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (50, 56, large)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (50, 57, large)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (50, 58, large)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (50, 59, large)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (50, 60, large)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (50, 61, large)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (50, 62, large)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (50, 63, large)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (50, 64, large)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (50, 65, large)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (50, 66, large)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (50, 67, large)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (50, 68, large)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (50, 69, large)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (50, 70, large)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (50, 71, large)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (50, 72, large)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (50, 73, large)-net in base 128 [i]
22No (50, 74, large)-net in base 128 [i]
23No (50, 75, large)-net in base 128 [i]
24No (50, 76, large)-net in base 128 [i]
25No (50, 77, large)-net in base 128 [i]
26No (50, 78, large)-net in base 128 [i]