Information on Result #466030

There is no (52, 54, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 55, large)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (52, 56, large)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (52, 57, large)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (52, 58, large)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (52, 59, large)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (52, 60, large)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (52, 61, large)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (52, 62, large)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (52, 63, large)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (52, 64, large)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (52, 65, large)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (52, 66, large)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (52, 67, large)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (52, 68, large)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (52, 69, large)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (52, 70, large)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (52, 71, large)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (52, 72, large)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (52, 73, large)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (52, 74, large)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (52, 75, large)-net in base 128 [i]
22No (52, 76, large)-net in base 128 [i]
23No (52, 77, large)-net in base 128 [i]
24No (52, 78, large)-net in base 128 [i]