Information on Result #466032

There is no (54, 56, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (54, 57, large)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (54, 58, large)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (54, 59, large)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (54, 60, large)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (54, 61, large)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (54, 62, large)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (54, 63, large)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (54, 64, large)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (54, 65, large)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (54, 66, large)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (54, 67, large)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (54, 68, large)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (54, 69, large)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (54, 70, large)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (54, 71, large)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (54, 72, large)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (54, 73, large)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (54, 74, large)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (54, 75, large)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (54, 76, large)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (54, 77, large)-net in base 128 [i]
22No (54, 78, large)-net in base 128 [i]