Information on Result #466040
There is no (62, 64, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (62, 65, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (62, 66, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (62, 67, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (62, 68, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (62, 69, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (62, 70, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (62, 71, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (62, 72, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (62, 73, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (62, 74, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (62, 75, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (62, 76, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (62, 77, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (62, 78, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||