Information on Result #466044
There is no (66, 68, large)-net in base 128, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (66, 69, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (66, 70, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (66, 71, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (66, 72, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (66, 73, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (66, 74, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (66, 75, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (66, 76, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (66, 77, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (66, 78, large)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||