Information on Result #466072

There is no (17, 19, large)-net in base 256, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (17, 20, large)-net in base 256 [i]m-Reduction
2No (17, 21, large)-net in base 256 [i]
3No (17, 22, large)-net in base 256 [i]
4No (17, 23, large)-net in base 256 [i]
5No (17, 24, large)-net in base 256 [i]
6No (17, 25, large)-net in base 256 [i]
7No (17, 26, large)-net in base 256 [i]
8No (17, 27, large)-net in base 256 [i]
9No (17, 28, large)-net in base 256 [i]
10No (17, 29, large)-net in base 256 [i]
11No (17, 30, large)-net in base 256 [i]
12No (17, 31, large)-net in base 256 [i]
13No (17, 32, large)-net in base 256 [i]
14No (17, 33, large)-net in base 256 [i]
15No (17, 34, large)-net in base 256 [i]
16No (17, 35, large)-net in base 256 [i]
17No (17, 36, large)-net in base 256 [i]
18No (17, 37, large)-net in base 256 [i]
19No (17, 38, large)-net in base 256 [i]