Information on Result #466073

There is no (18, 20, large)-net in base 256, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (18, 21, large)-net in base 256 [i]m-Reduction
2No (18, 22, large)-net in base 256 [i]
3No (18, 23, large)-net in base 256 [i]
4No (18, 24, large)-net in base 256 [i]
5No (18, 25, large)-net in base 256 [i]
6No (18, 26, large)-net in base 256 [i]
7No (18, 27, large)-net in base 256 [i]
8No (18, 28, large)-net in base 256 [i]
9No (18, 29, large)-net in base 256 [i]
10No (18, 30, large)-net in base 256 [i]
11No (18, 31, large)-net in base 256 [i]
12No (18, 32, large)-net in base 256 [i]
13No (18, 33, large)-net in base 256 [i]
14No (18, 34, large)-net in base 256 [i]
15No (18, 35, large)-net in base 256 [i]
16No (18, 36, large)-net in base 256 [i]
17No (18, 37, large)-net in base 256 [i]
18No (18, 38, large)-net in base 256 [i]
19No (18, 39, large)-net in base 256 [i]
20No (18, 40, large)-net in base 256 [i]
21No (18, 41, large)-net in base 256 [i]