Information on Result #466102

There is no (47, 49, large)-net in base 256, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (47, 50, large)-net in base 256 [i]m-Reduction
2No (47, 51, large)-net in base 256 [i]
3No (47, 52, large)-net in base 256 [i]
4No (47, 53, large)-net in base 256 [i]
5No (47, 54, large)-net in base 256 [i]
6No (47, 55, large)-net in base 256 [i]
7No (47, 56, large)-net in base 256 [i]
8No (47, 57, large)-net in base 256 [i]
9No (47, 58, large)-net in base 256 [i]
10No (47, 59, large)-net in base 256 [i]
11No (47, 60, large)-net in base 256 [i]
12No (47, 61, large)-net in base 256 [i]
13No (47, 62, large)-net in base 256 [i]
14No (47, 63, large)-net in base 256 [i]
15No (47, 64, large)-net in base 256 [i]
16No (47, 65, large)-net in base 256 [i]
17No (47, 66, large)-net in base 256 [i]
18No (47, 67, large)-net in base 256 [i]
19No (47, 68, large)-net in base 256 [i]