Information on Result #466105
There is no (50, 52, large)-net in base 256, because mutually orthogonal hypercube bound
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and t, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (50, 53, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (50, 54, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (50, 55, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (50, 56, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (50, 57, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (50, 58, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (50, 59, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (50, 60, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (50, 61, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (50, 62, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (50, 63, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (50, 64, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (50, 65, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (50, 66, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (50, 67, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (50, 68, large)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||