Information on Result #466862

There is no (45, 65, 396)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 37 237857 601185 750411 > 265

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 66, 396)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction