Information on Result #466865
There is no (51, 65, 2100)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 36 941682 642131 106196 > 265
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 66, 2100)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |