Information on Result #466868

There is no (57, 65, 172495)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 36 893528 271279 236881 > 265

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (57, 66, 172495)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction