Information on Result #467197

There is no (51, 79, 283)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 627589 478460 714959 296932 > 279

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 80, 283)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction