Information on Result #467479

There is no (57, 89, 299)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 630 534154 565495 195319 984210 > 289

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (57, 90, 299)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction